Begin with rights and economic purpose
We review how the token is issued, transferred, redeemed and used. Financial rights, stabilisation arrangements and access to a service can raise different questions. The assessment may identify issues under MiCA or other financial-services legislation that need more detailed analysis.
- Review of token terms and holder rights
- Classification questions and supporting assumptions
- Roles of the issuer, platform and distribution partners
Align disclosures and commercial documents
Public descriptions should match the contractual and technical position. We can help review website statements, offering materials and the relevant terms so that key limitations and responsibilities are explained consistently. The appropriate disclosure documents depend on the project and applicable framework.
- White-paper and disclosure support where applicable
- Token sale and platform terms
- Intellectual-property and third-party dependency review
Plan governance beyond issuance
A project needs to consider upgrades, changed benefits, interruptions and the management of funds or assets. We help document the legal responsibilities surrounding those events and identify matters for specialist technical or financial review. Contact us with the proposed token mechanics and target audience. We can agree a focused assessment before detailed documents are commissioned or promotional commitments are made.
Your questions, answered
Can you classify a token from its name alone?
No. Classification depends on the rights, features and practical arrangements, supported by sufficient information about the project.
Is a white paper the same as regulatory approval?
No. The applicable preparation, notification or approval requirements depend on the asset and framework. A document alone does not authorise every related activity.
General service information. The scope and provider of professional services are agreed in a separate engagement. Read our regulatory guide.